3 Months Old Baby Mauled in a Horrific Dog Attack in Thailand

Afternoon today. A 1-year-old leader was 3 months for child dog bite their output hospital thotthaso Andhra Pradesh. Chachoengsao province initially coma has many mortal head wound information tells me that the plotters dog baby but would like to remove this case I warn roei was a big dog’s habits, his descendants will be hot air time ngit ngat rae, he rarely likes to kid that only small jars of security functions in the summer like this don’t let him near our little offspring had shown roei. Rae requested to secure his lost sensitivity sensitivity is obviously not with painful rae.

The above is translation of the text in Thai I got with these photos. Could you make any sense of it? I tried to make some and this is what I came up with:

A 3 months old baby was mauled in a horrific attack by a 1 year old dog. The 1 year old dog had probably still too much puppy playfulness in him and may not have meant to maul the baby. A dog really meaning to bite would have likely cracked the infant’s skull. Whatever the reason – the wee man got his/her scalp torn up.

Translation also mentions the word coma, but it could simply mean that the baby was unconscious after the attack, but appear to be bottle fed in one of the photos. They wouldn’t force-feed a passed out child in Thailand, would they? Wait…

The translation also mentions mortal head wounds – it may again really mean “severe head wounds” cause they appear to treat the baby like it was still alive. The wounds were cleaned, but for some reason not sutured. Either way, that’s one lucky Thai baby. Many in that age group get thrown out to rot with garbage.

If you can interpret the translation better, please do. Or we can just settle on the fact that the baby was mauled after it dived to save his girlfriend.